Issue

Vol. 2 No. 01 (2022): "Ethics and Deontology" Journal

Ethical reference systems in political discourses: A comparison between the messages to the population of the heads of state of France, Germany and Romania at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic

https://doi.org/10.52744/RED.2022.01.09
Simona RODAT
Universitatea Adventus, Cernica, Ilfov, Romania

"Ethics and Deontology" Journal, Vol. 2 No. 01 (2022): "Ethics and Deontology" Journal

Abstract

The global Covid-19 pandemic has caused a number of unprecedented actions at the political level. In order to argue the need for the extraordinary measures that restricted social life, the heads of state addressed the population through explanatory, justifying, but also mobilizing speeches. This paper analyses the speeches given to the nation in March 2020, at the beginning of the pandemic, by the heads of state of three countries in the European Union: France, Germany and Romania. The main objective of the study was to identify the ethical reference systems to which the speakers appealed, and the method used was thematic discourse analysis. The study shows that the three heads of state used in their messages to the population, in a distinct way, ethical systems and frames of reference such as history, homeland, nation, European Union, humanity, democracy. The paper discusses in detail the ways in which these reference systems appear in the speeches, what aspects emphasized and eluded the speakers, as well as the similarities and differences revealed by the thematic analysis between the three discourses.

Keywords

ethical reference systems political speech thematic discourse analysis Covid-19 pandemic Emmanuel Macron Angela Merkel Klaus Johannis sisteme de referință etice discurs politic analiza tematică a discursului pandemia de Covid-19 Emmanuel Macron Angela Merkel Klaus Johannis
RODAT, S. (2022). Ethical reference systems in political discourses: A comparison between the messages to the population of the heads of state of France, Germany and Romania at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic. "Ethics and Deontology" Journal, 2(01), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.52744/RED.2022.01.09
References
  1. Brown, P. (2020). Studying COVID-19 in light of critical approaches to risk and uncertainty: research pathways, conceptual tools, and some magic from Mary Douglas. Health, Risk & Society, 22(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2020.1745508
  2. Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and Rhetoric. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  3. Cosmescu, A. (2010). Abordări actuale în analiza discursului. Buletin de Lingvistică, 11, 55-58.
  4. Iliescu, A. P. (2007). Etică socială și politică. București, Editura Ars Docendi.
  5. Krzyżanowski, M., Triandafyllidou, A., & Wodak, R. (2009). Conclusions: Europe, Media, Crisis and the European Public Sphere. In A. Triandafyllidou, R. Wodak, & M. Krzyżanowski (Eds.), The European Public Sphere and the Media: Europe in Crisis (pp. 261-268). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  6. LeHuffPost. (2020, Martie 16). Macron, discours du 16 mars 2020 [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhklV9uOvTQ
  7. Meier, K, Glatz, T., Guijt, M. C., Piccininni, M., van der Meulen, M., Atmar, K., Jolink, A. T. C., Kurth, T., Rohmann, J. L., Zamanipoor Najafabadi, A. H. (2020). Public perspectives on protective measures during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands, Germany and Italy: A survey study. Plos One, Published: August 5, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236917
  8. Nielsen, K. (1972). On Moral Truth. In F. J. Abbate (Ed.), The Philosophic Impulse: A Contemporary Introduction. Wadsworth Publishing Co.
  9. Rodat, S. (2019a). The first female prime minister of Romania in the focus of the news: Frames in the national media coverage. Revista Universitară de Sociologie, XV(1), 152-169.
  10. Rodat, S. (2019b). Towards a Hegemonic Femininity? Coverage of the First Female Romanian Prime Minister in the National and Local Media. Social Sciences and Education Research Review, 6(1), 112-145.
  11. Romero, D., Galeano, N., & Molina, A. (2008). VO Breeding Environments Value System and Metrics. In G. D. Putnik, & M. M. Cruz-Cunha (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Networked and Virtual Organizations, Volume III (pp. 1858-1863). IGI Global.
  12. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45.
  13. Sowińska, A. (2013). A critical discourse approach to the analysis of values in political discourse: The example of freedom in President Bush’s State of the Union addresses (2001–2008). Discourse & Society, 24(6), 792–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513486214
  14. Stenner, P. (1993). Discoursing jealousy. In E. Burman, & I. Parker (Eds.). Discourse Analytic Research: Repertoires and readings of texts in action (pp. 114-132). Routledge.
  15. Tagesschau. (2020, Martie 18). "Es ist ernst!" – Merkel-Ansprache zur Corona-Ausbreitung [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YS20YQbVE4
  16. TVR. (2020, Martie 17). Declarații Klaus Iohannis – decretul privind instaurarea stării de urgență [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckGo5witGsI
  17. Ussher, J. M., & Mooney-Somers, J. (2000). Negotiating Desire and Sexual Subjectivity: Narratives of Young Lesbian Avengers. Sexualities, 3(2), 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 136346000003002005
  18. van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (1985a). Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Volume 2: Dimensions of discourse. Academic Press.
  19. van Dijk, T. A. (1985b). Semantic Discourse Analysis. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.). Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Volume 2: Dimensions of discourse (pp. 103-136). Academic Press.
  20. van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Sage Publications.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF (LIMBA ROMâNă)
Statistic
Read Counter : 80 Download : 105